plato's cave 10.16.2006, 12:52 AM
posted by alex itin
Ben's post last week on the darker side of flash shone like a light bulb. I'd spent the morning manipulating a scanned image of Ditr Roth, by taking this video clip from Vimeo and downloading the source quicktime (which Vimeo allows you to do) importing that into i-movie and exporting thirteen still images as jpegs to sequence into an animated gif. Then I started pulling wav. files off cds and layering tracks and looping them and turning them into mpegs. In other words, it was a day like any other, but when I read Social Powerpoint, I considered how many little media format borders I'd just crossed and how many times I cross those borders on any given day in any given post and how much I take that freedom for granted. So, is flash like that damn wall they keep threatening to build in Texas, or built once in Germany and before that in China (and as a bird, or a bowerbird knows....walls never really work if you can fly over them, or go around)?
I don't know enough about flash coding, but I worry that these walls are all already there in the very way that people read different media. In the way that their eyeballs see them and their earballs hear them. A photograph and a drawing will both appear on a digital page as jpegs, but it still seems a little tricky to get people to look at them in relation to each other. In painting, you take two paintings and put them side by side: BANG, you have a diptych. It becomes a third thing. I thought that logic would translate very easily to a still image and a moving one, or a sound and word, but It seems that people like compartments. They like to have their still photos at flickr and their video on You tube and their music on i-tunes, and their book on tape as a podcast, etc. If things appear on a digital page together, they are meant to be surrounded by a trompe l'oeil metallic players just so that there's no aesthetic miscegenation going on. It's what we're used to.
I tend to use a bunch of media sharing services for IT IN place both as a way to host media and as a way of advertising. One of the realities I've come to deal with is that many more people are going to see my work as discrete media objects on flickr and vimeo than will ever make it to the blog to read these things together in the way that I intended. People seem to get something out of the picutres and the videos as pictures and videos, etc., but I always feel they are missing half the point. I think of it as reading sentence fragments, or stanzas and never seeing the whole poem.
At this point, each media is like a different language and trying to put them all together into a single whole is a Wasteland exercise... and the wasteland is patrolled by Minutemen and snakes.
Maybe, in some ways throwing these fragments out into the digital desert is part of the poetry. Maybe the networked landscape offers the thrill of archeology for the reader, like digging up little photo, sound, and video tiles that lead the reader on to find the mosaic. Today someone left a comment on flickr:
"your pieces are like secret boxes.. when i click the link it's like lifting a lid and inside there is always something surprisingly 'other' and beautiful.."....I could tack a hundred paintings on a hundred walls and never get a such a nice sentence in return.
But then there is the voice of my mother and also the significant other saying, "So how do you make money?"
It's important to point out that for me the nexus of meaning is in mark making (wether as writing, or drawing which I think are intimately and evolutionarily (?) cave connected). My practice always revolves around drawing... All the different media I use are like a series of mirrors that multiply all the possible ways to see and understand things, but as an art animal, my primary way of knowing where I stand in the funhouse is to make a mark and so I think my practice revolves around the drawings... they are the map, if you will. While not exactly having any sort of business model, I always figured digital media would lead people to want to see and maybe own the "original" drawings and paintings. Of course, I thought of it this way, because that's just what people traditionally have done: they sell things to people who collect things. It's what we're used to.
Maybe the past few months of deciphering fluxus history (and it's anti-art leanings) has put the zap on my head, but lately I'm a bit lost in a Labyrinth of my own creation. The blog has sort of become the work of art and none of it's discrete parts (read media) are more or less important...not when I'm successful in a post. It may be Greek and Latin and French and German and English and Japanese, but it has to be read together if you want to get the jokes. I don't know... maybe I'm speaking in tongues. I have a feeling the youtube generation will be malf blahming flah wast di blamspoontoop dang glover....
* addendum: as I wrote this, three people on flickr enquired about buying work.
alex itin on October 17, 2006 10:33 AM:
One of the more interesting things to happen during last weekend's open studios, is that I met in the Flesh for the first time, one of my flickrinos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sonjashield/
This is a person who has been in my life as an opinnion and kind words for the last year... It was something bordering on bizarre to have her walk up to me and annouce herself. I Know her as an avatar and not a face... why was it not floating over her head as she talked, I wondered?
I also joined an artists site:
that is trying to do internationally in the scene, what fecal face (fecalface.com) does for San Fran/Bay Area. Traffic is up quite a bit on IT IN place. Hard to know if its boonika,or all you wonderful ifbook people.
I suppose all of this leads me to a menion of Myspace and the "music model." One of the reasons the model works so well is that the bands need a crowd to make money at shows (and the concert venue is always where bands get paid...and records are where record companies get paid and so why Myspace offers an absolute shift in the music industry on about three or four levels) and people who are networking online need a real place to meet (or how will they ever have all the sex we keep hearing about?). It's a match made in heaven: Sex, linked networks, and rock and roll.
Something like a real world exhibition plays into this game for the art world... The wine and cheese crowd still needs to hobknob and hump and the neograffitto movement is more or less the same demographic as the hip hop/ rock/ rave myspace crowd.
The fact that these social sites allow one to share their own media allows them to function as a meritocracy for driving people to events, or just their eyes to web based work. The audience can instantly see what they like, or what looks good and the curious will follow links and comment... which is I supposed like linked laughter, or applause.
However, there does also seem to be a certain online political charm that needs to be nourished. I've encountered several very talented painters at flickr who get very few looks and less comments and they wonder why. I've also seen a lot of mediocre work get disproportional attention. Clearly there is a bit of a game to online social networkding. You have to find like minded people, you have to commment on their work, you have to support their events, etc...In other words: the community works best when its a community.
It's slightly odd that I've been doing IT IN place for over a year and I'm only now giving these issues serious thought. I was just more interested in making it, but now that there'so much of ME there, it seems important that a few more people read, look, hear, watch it.
alex itin on October 18, 2006 4:20 PM:
As follow up on the three (now four) flickrfolks who have in the last week enquired about the general market status of my work (art speak for:"Dude are you selling that shit? How much?"); I've decided to make a new Set: "LOVE FOR SALE"
This set is designe to establish clearly what that I've posted over the last year and change on flickr is available and what is already sold, or is part of a larger work, or impending exhibition.
As a note to this note: I am able to do this partly due to someone's charity of buying me as a gift a "FULL MEMBERSHIP" in Flickr (something Flickr makes very easy to do on all members profiles: "BUY THIS PERSON A FULL MEMBERSHIP" option). This allows me unlimited uploads,unlimited sets, and restreamed all the old photos (Free limit is 200 photos) that had slipped into Flickr Purgatory.
THankyou Mr. VAXINE