« Gataga - social bookmark search and exploration engine | Main | more than half of journalists use blogs, study shows »

on second thought... (wikis are hard) Post date  06.21.2005, 10:24 AM

posted by ben vershbow

The LA Times has temporarily shelved its plans for running "wikatorials" - editorials that any reader can edit - due to a flood of "inappropriate material." The whole experiement with wikis was a risky move for a well-established newspaper to take, and it's not surprising that they immediately panicked once the riff raff showed up. It's hard to establish an open, collaborative environment from the top-down. Whereas, if you start from a point of low stakes, with little prestige on the line (as Wikipedia did), then the enterprise can evolve slowly, embarrassing missteps, spam and all.

Someone should start an experiment: dump the LA Times content in a non-affiliated wiki and try the wikatorials there. Give it time, let the community build, work out the hiccups, and then give the LA Times a call.

Posted by ben vershbow on June 21, 2005 10:24 AM
tags: Publishing, Broadcast, and the Press, the_networked_book

comments (1):



fournierarrow2.jpgBrian on June 22, 2005 1:05 AM:

I wish they would have letten it work itself out...maybe they will take another go at it.

(Because of spam troubles, first-time comments from unfamiliar addresses or containing multiple links might be held for moderation. If your comment isn't spam, we'll publish it very soon. Thanks in advance for your patience.)




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)