I'd be hard pressed to come up with another example of a text that would work in the Bible-on-DVD format. Maybe other sacred texts, where the very "bookness" of the text is what makes it important. But who'd want, say, the latest Tom Clancy thriller in this format?

OTOH, I've argued before that audiobooks should include an e-book version of the same text, just so readers have both options. I find that the only place I want to listen to texts rather than read them is in the car, so if I'm halfway through an audiobook and don't have anywhere to drive to, it'd be great to have an e-book option as a backup.

"But who'd want, say, the latest Tom Clancy thriller in this format?"

Anyone for whom the format of a book is intrinsic to its pleasure. Clancy, I think not. But consider picture books, graphic novels, poetry, or quite a bit of literary fiction and nonfiction where the relationship of word to page is conscious and rigorous.

Librarians have talked about the combined ebook/audiobook for years--a book that would provide a seamless environment for moving between text and audio.

Documentary filmmakers with old subjects frequently struggle to bring a world to life with static materials. Ken Burns' "Civil War" series comes to mind with its innumerable soldiers' letters read aloud by actors as a lonely fiddle plays and the camera pans over a mottled handwritten page or grainy archival photograph. The static comes curiously to life.

The DVD bible strives for a similar effect, conveying the sense of real voices amid real events with an ample dose of sentimentality. It does this as an audio book might, but maintaining a vital visual connection with the source text. You read, watch, and listen all at once.

I don't mean to imply that this approach would work well for all texts. Nor do I mean to endorse its Hallmark sensibility, only to appreciate a kind of cunning that went into the thing. The makers of the DVD were working specifically with the bible in mind, which, in many households is the only book that can be said to rival the centrality of television. They used the new criteria to open up a very old book, while still essentially being faithful to it as a text.

Well, faithful if you consider the King James version the right one to use. ;) The "text" of the Bible has been up for discussion, and frequent reinterpretation, for thousands of years. When I see the NRSV version, then I'll get excited.

Not entirely sure what you mean by the "Hallmark" presentation. I do agree it seems to be designed very well for Bible study.

I can tell you many stories about ministers and technology--a group that is very low-tech on the whole but will learn a new technology, such as the PDA, in order to benefit from ebooks and similar tools. Olive Tree is a company well known for its PDA versions of the Bible and other scriptural resources.

I mean Hallmark simply in terms of the cheesy graphic design and the style of the voiceovers and soundtrack (more amply on display in the demo).

I've also heard numerous stories of the church as an early adopter of technology: ministers "godcasting" sermons, and of course, the Australian Bible Society's translation of the bible (CEV) into SMS.

I get you--this version is definitely not an Episcopalian or Congregational God.

the relationship of text to spoken word is very interesting. we once published a cdrom, Poetry in Motion, which consisted of 24 short videos of poets performing their work. readers/viewers were delighted to be able to watch, listen and read all at the same time. i always thought there was something magical going on in the margins between the video and the text. the whole was greater than the sum of its parts. (you can see a demo of Poetry in Motion here.)

Recently a librarian worried that we are all headed back to the "chaos" of the Manuscript Age, but the positive side of that is how playful text was in that period, based at least on my limited understanding of illuminated manuscripts. Maybe not the greatest ROI, but they sure were pretty. Today we can produce and share genre-bending documents much more easily.

Other cultures mix image and text on paper more than we do in this country. Graphic novels (and graphic creative nonfiction, as I consider Maus) have a slender toehold, but not like they do elsewhere. In this country we feel pictures are for kids. 500 years ago, pictures and text were considered sacred!

I think when it's digital, people will be more comfortable with blended media. People have very rigid ideas of what a book should be.

We have several ideas here; the ebook/audiobook, the DVD with cinematographic embellishment, the Bible Society of Australia's "translation" of the Bible into SMS, and poets performing their own work in a medium that gives us the written text, the audio and the visual. All important advances in the search for the "book" that covers all fields, but still presenting an inert object that lacks the dynamism and plasticity that we see is possible with new technologies. Ben's point, when quoting Jesse, that:

it's not technology that's causing a decline in book-reading, but rather a lack of new technologies that make books readable in the new communications environment. He was talking about books online, but the DVD bible serves just as well to illustrate how a text (a text that, to say the least, is still in high demand) might be repurposed in the context of newer media.

The exciting thing about repurposing, or directly publishing in the context of newer media, is that we can have a book in which the bibliophile in us can feel the weight of the page (the velum as opposed to paper in Sally Northmore's beautiful post on Turning the Pages,) but also one that allows us to enlarge sections, to look inside illustrations, to hear its sounds, and best of all, that offers the scholarly tags, and even more, the truly open one where discussion among readers shows how different their book is to mine even though we are reading the same one. The possibilities are mesmerizing and profound, a whole subversion of the creative act. Here indeed, reading is writing.

Yes, the book is a fetish, and how wonderful that technology has the potential to feed it in ways unthought of before.

Sol: I love this notion of feeding the fetish. It brings to mind Kim White's image (in if:book's first post) of the book as a behemoth lumbering through time, incorporating new objects and sub-species into its bulk.

Just to add: a major godcasting site I've come across is sermonaudio.com -- where "faith cometh by hearing."

The Talmud on DVD

I don’t know if any of you have picked up the project at Bar Ilan University in Israel, called The Global Jewish Database, or The Responsa Project. You can find it at: http://www.biu.ac.il/ICJI/Responsa/index.html. It is a concordance gone computer literate, in which you can find commentary (Talmudic, Jewish commentary that is) on almost anything in the Talmud or, by direct derivation, on your daily concerns, or daily life as defined by Jewish law. It is totally authority driven and top-down structured, after all it is about finding your way around traditional, Orthodox, Jewish sacred texts. And it predates any non-military computer project I know of, having begun in the 1960s.

But while you are talking about bibles, here is another interesting take on the problem of bringing sacred text to your local community. As far as I can determine, it does not try literally to reproduce the feel, or look, of the book. (There are some sites that do show you the look and feel and movement of a page of Talmud, but they are pretty basic, no page turning, no three dimensional feel. And of course literal “page turning” is not necessarily a useful Talmudic process). There is no physicality to the sentiment, although sentiment is clearly there. It is totally about linking information, albeit within a self-defined and closed universe. In a sense it is the opposite of the bible as object that Ben began this blog with, but it is still a representation of the central sacred text.