« Gataga - social bookmark search and exploration engine | Main | more than half of journalists use blogs, study shows »

on second thought... (wikis are hard) Post date  06.21.2005, 10:24 AM

The LA Times has temporarily shelved its plans for running "wikatorials" - editorials that any reader can edit - due to a flood of "inappropriate material." The whole experiement with wikis was a risky move for a well-established newspaper to take, and it's not surprising that they immediately panicked once the riff raff showed up. It's hard to establish an open, collaborative environment from the top-down. Whereas, if you start from a point of low stakes, with little prestige on the line (as Wikipedia did), then the enterprise can evolve slowly, embarrassing missteps, spam and all.

Someone should start an experiment: dump the LA Times content in a non-affiliated wiki and try the wikatorials there. Give it time, let the community build, work out the hiccups, and then give the LA Times a call.

Posted by ben vershbow at June 21, 2005 10:24 AM
tags: Publishing, Broadcast, and the Press, the_networked_book

Comments

I wish they would have letten it work itself out...maybe they will take another go at it.

Posted by: Brian at June 22, 2005 01:05 AM

Post a comment (might take a few moments to appear)




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)